<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More Palin Hatin&#8217; &#8211; Progressive Women Take Part</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hillaryorbust.com/2008/10/more-palin-hatin-progressive-women-take-part/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hillaryorbust.com/2008/10/more-palin-hatin-progressive-women-take-part/</link>
	<description>one woman, one vote</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 20:40:07 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Infidel753</title>
		<link>http://hillaryorbust.com/2008/10/more-palin-hatin-progressive-women-take-part/comment-page-1/#comment-785</link>
		<dc:creator>Infidel753</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 13:15:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hillaryorbust.com/?p=253#comment-785</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;when these idealistic young women realize that leftist men don’t give a crap about their issues&lt;/i&gt;

I don&#039;t think one can realliy generalize by gender in that way.  Plenty of men believe in female equality, supported Hillary, became PUMAs, and have been appalled at the misogyny aimed at Hillary and at Palin. And plenty of women, not all of them young or naive, have been participants in that campaign of misogyny.  Gender is a surprisingly poor predictor of attitudes either way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>when these idealistic young women realize that leftist men don’t give a crap about their issues</i></p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think one can realliy generalize by gender in that way.  Plenty of men believe in female equality, supported Hillary, became PUMAs, and have been appalled at the misogyny aimed at Hillary and at Palin. And plenty of women, not all of them young or naive, have been participants in that campaign of misogyny.  Gender is a surprisingly poor predictor of attitudes either way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T B</title>
		<link>http://hillaryorbust.com/2008/10/more-palin-hatin-progressive-women-take-part/comment-page-1/#comment-784</link>
		<dc:creator>T B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 04:23:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hillaryorbust.com/?p=253#comment-784</guid>
		<description>I gotta say, I&#039;ve not taken a particular interest in sexism until I started reading your blog and I think the reason I never noticed is not only because I&#039;ve never been a blatant victim, but also because the form of it now days is SO different than the form of sexism we learned about in our history books. This isn&#039;t women labeled as bare-foot and pregnant in the home doing &quot;womens work&quot; type of sexism; this proves it with the comments of how she is a bad mother for not being there 100% for her infant, this is calling her names reserved especially for women BY women. And Sandra Bernard did that &quot;comedy&quot; routine expressing how she hopes Palin is gang raped. This is Campbell Brown perverting the meaning of sexism by saying that Palin doing a private interview is oppressive and sexist by the McCain campaign all the while her Messiah Lord Barack Obama is paying women less per dollar than the men on his campaign. This sexism is not about men bringing women down, it&#039;s women bring women down.

Something is wrong here...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I gotta say, I&#8217;ve not taken a particular interest in sexism until I started reading your blog and I think the reason I never noticed is not only because I&#8217;ve never been a blatant victim, but also because the form of it now days is SO different than the form of sexism we learned about in our history books. This isn&#8217;t women labeled as bare-foot and pregnant in the home doing &#8220;womens work&#8221; type of sexism; this proves it with the comments of how she is a bad mother for not being there 100% for her infant, this is calling her names reserved especially for women BY women. And Sandra Bernard did that &#8220;comedy&#8221; routine expressing how she hopes Palin is gang raped. This is Campbell Brown perverting the meaning of sexism by saying that Palin doing a private interview is oppressive and sexist by the McCain campaign all the while her Messiah Lord Barack Obama is paying women less per dollar than the men on his campaign. This sexism is not about men bringing women down, it&#8217;s women bring women down.</p>
<p>Something is wrong here&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
